Search
 
 

Display results as :
 

 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Supermodel(s) (For KC)
by Teenwrestler Today at 11:59 am

» Party Hard vs MIO - Handicap Bedroom Match
by Yori Today at 11:47 am

» Work (Sayumi Arai)
by Yori Today at 11:44 am

» The Idols of Berserk Vs. Blazing Blizzard
by Teenwrestler Today at 11:31 am

» The Black Fang vs. Sien Teist - Old School
by Yori Today at 7:10 am

Who is online?
In total there are 31 users online :: 7 Registered, 0 Hidden and 24 Guests :: 1 Bot

BobbyBlue, BrittanyW, Cicilia, GrandAkumaShogun, Harrier, Teenwrestler, Yori

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 155 on Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:33 am
Champions & #1 contenders
FRICTION


Friction World Champion
Cecilia Northman
#1 contender
Kyoko Akan


Tag team Champions
The Imperial Order
#1 contenders
Sonic Boom


Kawaii Champion
Claire St. Clair
#1 contender


Hardcore Champion
Silver Ace
#1 contender
???


Friction Hentai Champion
Minerva Larsen
#1 contender
Ari Nagawa


Entropy Champion
Valley Doll
#1 contender
Alicia Wells


Softcore Champion
Under Contention (in an elimination chamber)
#1 contender



TENSION


Tension World Champion
Clyde Gastin
#1 contender
Killer King & Reira Kirishima


Tension tag team champions
White Gale (Daisuke Kamiya & Sion)
#1 contender
Abigail Adams & Jenny Quick


Tension Hentai Champion
Leo Fandero
#1 contender
???


Tension 24/7 Champion
Vacant
#1 contender
David Blake & Ryo Kamiya

Apologies for delays for a lot of my threads

Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:44 pm by Vcom7418

Dunno why I haven't posted this earlier.

Finals week is fully underway for me, and as such, I had to prioritise my threads depending on how soon they have to be finished (ie - Avalance build threads)

I will be back to full capacity on Friday/Saturday. My apologies for the delays.

Comments: 2

Friction debut match.

Sat Dec 09, 2017 7:28 pm by no^capitals-

I'm looking for a match to get my first heels career in AFW started. Will be happy to discuss finer details with anybody that is interested. Get in contact however you see fit. :3

Comments: 2

Samantha Fox's Open challenge

Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:54 pm by Lotuswarrior

Looking for someone to accept Samantha's open challenge, but the catch is its more of a call out. Basically Samantha will dig up some dirt on whoever and threaten to tell the world later that night or next show.

Overall I expect this to span across a few matches just for a short rival segment and little story for both our characters. Here's an idea I currently have for the possible matches.

1: Promo
2: 1 on 1 Normal Match
3: 1 on 1 No DQ
4: Ladder Match(The briefcase above the ring would …

[ Full reading ]

Comments: 5


Royal Rumble?

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Kitten on Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:42 pm

Why not use DICE?

Make it random.

Every 6 posts a random number is picked and that person gets eliminated.

30 people. 29 Eliminations. 29x6=.... lets me pick my calculator... where is the fucking calculator in windows?! 174 posts...

ok... people need to be eliminated faster... but faster than 6 psots?!

_________________
Kitten's Girls


avatar
Kitten

Posts : 7372
Join date : 2010-03-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by kerflubble on Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:53 pm

don't worry, I assure people that Adrian's innevitable attempts at trying to Flair this Rumble will not be too boring.

_________________
Under construction study
Adrian Kytes (Face/Tweener) Outspoken All-Rounder
Rebecca Tomko (Tweener/Heel) Amazon Enforcer
Sabine Shanoa (Tweener) Sensual Succubi
Tina Armstrong (Face) Blue-Eyed Superstar
Yelena Turova (Face) Crushing Powerhouse
Pantha (Face) Pride of the Jungle
Anna Silver (Face) Ardent Angel
avatar
kerflubble

Posts : 6328
Join date : 2011-04-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Tatyina on Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:59 pm

The entrances would be mostly random...

I suppose if there really WAS enough interest in it, then maybe even multiple characters from members could be used.

But I am telling you RIGHT NOW, I have thought this out quite a bit and doing it the way I layed out is really the only way it's going to have any sort of success.

_________________
Ask for a name change at your own risk! kelyeah

Akashi Fem Gab Luk Nik Yuu
(M)Managers, (W)restlers, etc:

Allie P(M) Junko(M/W) Mam (M/W) Mercy
Abbey Belle
et al.
avatar
Tatyina

Posts : 27333
Join date : 2009-04-02
Age : 97
Location : VIP Box inside the AFWDome

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Harrier on Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:03 pm

@Tatyina

I would also not take part in it, just commentate it with Ise.

The problem with a really short and random time is probably that many people won't bite for the concept then and you have a match without easy to pick, semiactive "Jobbers", just a bunch of superhyped posters who will get extra butthurt if they are taken out only for the sake of space, even if posts were good and in rapid time(I probably would). I would therefore give at least a set time of 3 days(people get ill/job etc etc) to post. I thought of the time with a gaze of the EC too, but we were talking about 3+ weeks of nothing there. That would be 90 days with 30 participants, 3 months if everyone has to be kicked instead of being eliminated, and that surely won't happen. EC is running for how long right now, 4+ Months?

Maybe look at is as a test baloon for a rumble mods can plan, see what sinks or swims? It takes place on a B Level PPV anyway.

@Kitten
I thought(in general) about dice too. Peoples numbers are absolutely selected with a random dice roll, lady luck should decide when you come in.
avatar
Harrier

Posts : 5931
Join date : 2011-11-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Tatyina on Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:15 pm

I think you're missing what I am saying.

You just don't set a time when people are added. You add them when it seems convenient. And you don't just eliminate something because they haven't posted in an hour either.

If there's a lull in the action, ADD a member. If there are too many members and it's starting to clusterfuck, you remove a member or two.

The idea isn't to completely micromanage the the match, but you still have to keep it very strictly moderated.

someone could get away with not posting for a few days if there was a steady stream other posts going on. But I wouldn't let them use that steady stream of posts to try and get an advantage either by just NOT posting.

and, i already KNOW what sinks and swims, I've planned PLENTY of group events in my day. Why should we waste the members time with something that is just going to fail. And why should we expect them to be interested in a NEW one when the first one went to shit?

_________________
Ask for a name change at your own risk! kelyeah

Akashi Fem Gab Luk Nik Yuu
(M)Managers, (W)restlers, etc:

Allie P(M) Junko(M/W) Mam (M/W) Mercy
Abbey Belle
et al.
avatar
Tatyina

Posts : 27333
Join date : 2009-04-02
Age : 97
Location : VIP Box inside the AFWDome

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Alexandra on Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:34 pm

Something exciting is fine. But as far as a Royal Rumble goes, that's the kind of thing I would probably avoid, just due to my own tastes. Too many people getting involved in a match at one time is just too much for me. :X
avatar
Alexandra

Posts : 10712
Join date : 2009-06-21
Age : 31
Location : Neo Cyber City, 3 A.M.

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Kitten on Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:35 pm

[quote="Harrier":8e0ef8ax]
@Kitten
I thought(in general) about dice too. Peoples numbers are absolutely selected with a random dice roll, lady luck should decide when you come in.


And out.... trust me...it can work like that

_________________
Kitten's Girls


avatar
Kitten

Posts : 7372
Join date : 2010-03-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Bluemouse on Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:14 pm

It's been discussed in the past. It would require structure and teamwork beyond what we are capable of. My bet goes on "doesn't go well".

_________________
The Mouseum

Bluemouse

Posts : 11144
Join date : 2010-10-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Oathkeeper on Sat Nov 17, 2012 4:24 am

Well, why don't we have a smaller match like a 1v1v1v1 match? with the same rules?
avatar
Oathkeeper

Posts : 3730
Join date : 2010-02-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Harrier on Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:25 am

Hm, Tatyina has obviously already put a lot of thought in that. And to tell you the truth, I am unable to organize it in the way suggested. It's not like I don't believe it doesn't work in that way, it's just not my type of organisation.

Anyway, thanks for putting down the information about the rumble itself. <img src=" title="Very Happy" />
avatar
Harrier

Posts : 5931
Join date : 2011-11-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Royal Rumble?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum